Home About Laser Critic Search Page Disclaimer FPC What's New

Up
Issue 8
News
More News
News in Review
Osha
Corporate Info

Company Damage Blamed On Faulty Grinnell Materials

When a Texas drug company sustained tens of thousands of dollars in flood damage, it came to the same conclusion that other customers of Grinnell Fire Protection Company have come to: sue Grinnell for providing faulty materials or shoddy workmanship.

The Medi-Flex Hospital Products Inc. of El Paso, Texas was flooded on October 7, 1999 when a vast amount of water inundated the company's facility on Butterfield Trail. The company, which manufactures pharmaceuticals, sustained "a large amount of damage to the building, building contents, (its) business products, inventory, personal property and an interruption in (its) daily business," according to a lawsuit filed against Grinnell Fire Protection Company.

According to the lawsuit, negligence on behalf of Grinnell was the cause of the failure of the automatic fire protection sprinkler system.

Grinnell was "negligent in the design, manufacture, installation, inspection, modification, repair and/or maintenance of the sprinkler system," the lawsuit alleged.

Specifically, Medi-Flex claims that Grinnell installed a defective, out-of-round six-inch tee section and interfit clamp that slipped off the end of a six-inch header pipeline, causing a break in the system and allowing water to flow onto the plaintiff's sensitive inventory.

The lawsuit claims that Grinnell installed faulty materials, breached its warranty to supply proper materials and perform proper installation of a sprinkler system.

Damage was estimated in excess of $160,000.

Grinnell Didn't Let Homeowners Know Their Fire Suppression System Couldn't Work

 

SAN DIEGO, CA — When the safety of residents in a San Diego condominium was compromised for several years by a fire suppression system that would not work, the owners laid the blame on Grinnell Fire Protection Systems.

The Landing Homeowners Association filed suit against Grinnell Fire Protection Systems Company claiming that Grinnell was responsible for the failure of the homeowners association to know for several years that its fire suppression system was seriously compromised.

During 1997, the Landing discovered for the first time that there were "numerous fire sprinkler heads that were over-sprayed with paint, stucco, and/or other material..." 

Alleging that inspections from 1992 and 1997 failed to identify the problem, the homeowners laid the responsibility on Grinnell by filing the action Aug. 11, 1998.

"Defendant breached the agreement...by failing to perform a fire sprinkler inspection with reasonable diligence, including but not limited to failing to properly inspect and/or identify numerous sprinkler heads that had been over-sprayed with paint, stucco, and/or some other material," the lawsuit stated.

Back Home Up Next