Main About Laser Critic Search Disclaimer FPC What's NEW

 

LITIGATION
ROOFER IMPALED AFTER FALL FROM SCAFFOLD: OLSON V. HAWKINS, OTHERS

Clay Olson was a roofer who was supposed to install roofing at the University of Nebraska at Omaha Fine Arts Building. Hawkins was the general contractor on this job. While attempting to ascend to the roof, Olson fell from the scaffolding, and after he fell 15 feet, his pelvis was impaled on a scaffold pole. He suffered severe, disabling injury, and his medical bills alone were almost $70,000. According to his court complaint, Hawkins failed to properly and adequately supervise the construction of the scaffold.

WORKER INJURED AT HAWKINS’ BENSON HIGH SCHOOL JOB: HARDESTY V. HAWKINS

Hawkins was the general contractor on a roofing job at Benson High School in Omaha, Nebraska. Hawkins attempted to bridge two sections of the roof with a steel ramp. But Elmer Hardesty slipped on the ramp and suffered painful back injuries. Hardesty incurred medical expenses of almost $18,000. His complaint charged that Hawkins:

". . . failed to properly supervise the repairing of the roof, failed to provide standard railing for crossing over walkways, failed to provide a ramp that was properly designed and constructed by qualified persons, failed to leave spaces in the ramps so that any mud, oil etc. would pass through the openings and provide better traction for workers, and failed to provide a safe place to work."

HAWKINS LEAVES HOLE IN ROOF, WORKER FALLS: HARRISON, OTHERS, V. HAWKINS

Hawkins was the general contractor on the construction of the water plant in Ashland, Nebraska. During that work, Hawkins cut a hole in the roof of the plant. Charles Harrison, a 50-year-old roofer, fell through the hole, and suffered permanent injuries. His medical bills were almost $7,000. His court complaint charged that Hawkins:

" . . . failed to cover or otherwise mark the hole, after making it in the roof, failed to warn Harrison about the hole, and failed to inspect the premises to insure that the hole remained covered."

DRUNKEN HAWKINS SUPERVISOR CAUSED INJURY TO WORKERS FACE, CHARGES COURT COMPLAINT: McCLARNON V. HAWKINS

Russell McClarnon and a Hawkins supervisor were carrying a 150 pound piece of plywood at a job site. But the supervisor was drunk, and dropped his end of the plywood. The plywood then struck McClarnon in the nose and face. He suffered severe and permanent injuries, and his medical bills

HAWKINS’ NEGLIGENCE INJURES FIVE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC

In the following case a Hawkins customer, the City of Omaha was sued on a case where a member of the public was injured while walking near the Hawkins job site. In other cases, Hawkins’ negligence is blamed for traffic accidents near a Hawkins job and on Omaha’s streets.

NISLY V. HAWKINS

When Darlene Nisly was walking by the site, she tripped over a high spot in the paving and fell. She tore the rotator cup in her shoulder...

Hawkins was working on a construction job for the City of Omaha Police Plaza. When Darlene Nisly was walking by the site, she tripped over a high spot in the paving and fell. She tore the rotator cup in her shoulder and suffered other injuries. She sued Hawkins, charging that Hawkins negligently had failed to warn of the danger posed by the irregular paving, and failed to provide a safe path through the site. Just as importantly, she sued the City of Omaha, who was Hawkins’ construction customer, for the same failures.

PETERSON V. HAWKINS, GEARHART V. HAWKINS

In these two cases, Hawkins was performing work on Interstate 480, and had piled huge mounds of topsoil to the side of the Interstate. But it rained that summer, and large amounts of water and earth spilled onto the highway. In August, Jeffery Gearhart was driving his Suzuki motorcycle along I-480, when he hit this accumulation of water and mud. His cycle slid out of control, and he suffered injuries. But Hawkins did not correct this problem. So, the next month, Gordon Peterson came driving along I-480, this time on an older model Suzuki. He also skidded through the water and mud, and also crashed, suffering severe back injuries.

Here are two court cases involving traffic accidents. While these cases may seem unimportant at first glance, the injured parties in similar cases have sued the customer of the construction company that was involved in the accident.

SMART V. HAWKINS

Brigitte Smart was driving her Toyota Camry near downtown Omaha, when a Hawkins truck forced her off of the road, into a parked car. Smart suffered back injuries.

WESLEY V. HAWKINS

Rhonda Wesley was driving through south Omaha, when a Hawkins truck rear ended her car. Her medical expenses for her permanent and painful back injuries, totaled over $35,500.

alone exceeded $12,000. His suit charged that Hawkins was liable for the gross and negligent actions of their supervisor.

MAURER V. HAWKINS, OTHERS

Hawkins won the contract to remove the 24th Street train viaduct in south Omaha. But when Hawkins tried to lift up the viaduct with three cranes, the structure fell to pieces, scattering heavy iron and concrete chunks like an explosion. A piece of iron struck Alvin Mauer, a Hawkins supervisor. He suffered severe and disfiguring injuries, and his right arm is virtually useless. The suit charged the defendants in this case, which included Hawkins, with failing to properly review the engineering information necessary to perform a safe removal of the viaduct. Union Pacific, the city of Omaha, and the State of Nebraska were also sued. This case illustrates an important reason why construction customers must be concerned about litigation. If the contractor makes a mistake and workers or members of the public are injured, the construction customer is still liable. In this case, Union Pacific eventually filed a cross-complaint against Hawkins in November, 1999. The complaint charged the Hawkins was obligated to indemnify Union Pacific against any claims and damages

HAWKINS’ JOBS GO BAD IN OMAHA:

• FATHER FLANAGAN SUES HAWKINS FOR DAMAGES AT BOYS TOWN

• HAWKINS CAUSES WALL CAVE-IN AT CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY

• HAWKINS CEMENT POUR CLOGS UP UNDERGROUND SEWERS IN DOWNTOWN OMAHA

FATHER FLANAGAN V. HAWKINS

Boys Town, a pastoral campus west of Omaha, has been taking care of wayward boys for most of this century. It was memorialized in a 1930’s movie starring Spencer Tracy, and by its logo: one boy carrying a younger lad over his shoulder, exclaiming, "He ain’t heavy father, he’s my brother." But this court case indicates that Hawkins Construction lacked respect for the Boys Town mission.

The problems began when Hawkins started its highway job near Boys Town, on Dodge Street. When the March rains came, "substantial and extraordinary amounts of silt" and mud flowed from the exposed grounds of the construction site, onto the Boys Town campus, and into Father Flanagan’s Lake. These sediment deposits damaged the lake and surrounding property. Father Flanagan’s representatives immediately notified Hawkins of the problems on several occasions. But Hawkins did not take the necessary preventative measures, including erecting and maintaining silt fences, siltation basins, and by seeding promptly the exposed dirt slopes at the construction site.

Father Flanagan sued Hawkins for over $102,000, for the costs of inspecting and then dredging the silt from the lake. This is one of four court cases that charge Hawkins with causing property damages by failing to control run-off and erosion at their construction sites. Hawkins had a run-in with another of Omaha’s Catholic icons in the next case, this one involving Creighton University.

HAWKINS HAS MORE PROBLEMS WITH STORM WATER RUN-OFF

K-T company V. HAWKINS, CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY

Both Hawkins, and their customer, Creighton University, were sued in this case. Creighton had hired Hawkins to work on a retaining wall that bordered the Creighton Campus. But in the course of removing the old wall, Hawkins so weakened the remaining walls, that a rainstorm caused a remaining wall to collapse against an apartment house, causing over $90,000 in damages. The suit charged that Hawkins was negligent for the following reason:

"Hawkins negligently failed to secure Creighton University’s remaining retaining wall, failed to place area drains at Creighton’s retaining wall, to relieve hydrostatic pressure, and diminished the strength of the remaining retaining wall."

A HAWKINS CEMENT POUR FLOWED INTO OMAHA’S DOWNTOWN SEWER SYSTEM

CITY OF OMAHA V. HAWKINS, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD

The Woodmen of the World Insurance Society hired Hawkins to build a new parking lot in downtown Omaha. But when Hawkins commenced their cement pour for the foundation, Hawkins failed to notice that their wet cement was flowing into an uncapped sewer lateral. The concrete flowed into an adjacent sewer line, and set, totally blocking that sewer with hardened concrete.

The City began receiving complaints about blocked sewers, and had to excavate the area, discover the concrete deposits and repair the area.

The City sued not only Hawkins, but Hawkins customers, the Woodmen Society. The City charged:

"Hawkins failed to properly supervise the capping of sewer line, failed to properly supervise the construction of the parking garage, and poured concrete in such large quantities that they should have been aware that the sewer line was not capped."

The Contractor’s Critic wondered this, too. Didn’t Hawkins notice that it was pouring far too much concrete for the size of the job? Did the Woodmen have to pay Hawkins for the scores of square yards of concrete that got poured into the city sewers?

disputes with contractors

Hawkins has had several disputes with its subcontractors and suppliers. These disputes can blow up and harm the construction customers, especially if an angry supplier or subcontractor files a lien against the construction customer’s property.

HAWKINS V. INTERSTATE detroit diesel, WALDINGER V. HAWKINS

These two court cases revolve around Hawkins’ work on the Skyline Reservoir, for the Metropolitan Utilities District, west of Omaha. Hawkins subcontracted with Waldinger to install several pumps. But Hawkins refused to pay Waldinger for the total cost of the pumps. So Waldinger had to sue Hawkins.

Then Hawkins sued the pump supplier, Interstate, charging that the pumps cost more than was fair.

SADLER LINE construction V. HAWKINS

Hawkins subcontracted traffic light work to Sadler Line, on a highway job. But Hawkins refused to pay Sadler the $124,490 that was due, so Sadler had to sue.

HAWKINS V. AMOCO oil company

Most of us, including the Hawkins workers, will never get to drive a Ferrari. From 1984 to 1996, the Testarossa model was not only the top of the Ferrari line, but for most of that time it was the fastest regular production sports car in the world. It was the definition of "supercar" in its era, the benchmark against which all sports cars are measured.

It is fast and sleek and temperamental, and a pure joy to handle on the open road. But you have to be careful. Fred Hawkins, Jr., the President of Hawkins, pumped diesel into his Ferrari Testarossa. That ruined the engine and drive train, causing over $25,000 in damages. He sued Amoco, the service station where he pumped the diesel, for the damages.

Back Critic Up Next