|
| |
|
Safety Records |
|
May 2001: More Colonial
Mechanical Safety Violations and Fines |
| Two of the clearest signs of a construction company cutting
corners are a sloppy worksite and employees forced to use unsafe equipment.
Unfortunately, those are also conditions that can lead to serious injury,
death and lawsuits seeking astronomical awards.
The Virginia Department of Labor and Industry documented these very
problems when visiting a Colonial Mechanical Corporation’s jobsite on May
22, 2001. According to Virginia Occupational Safety and Health Program
inspection report (#304127079), employees for Colonial Mechanical working at
the Richmond Convention Center in Richmond, Virginia were exposed to trips
and falls because of debris piled adjacent to walkways, work areas, portable
toilets, first aid stations and dumpsters.
The debris was comprised of pieces of bricks, duct work, piping, metal
studding, sheet rock, plywood, lumber, wire and swept piles of trash. There
was so much trash that the company was cited for violating the state’s
safety laws. That was not the end of the story.
Inspectors also discovered that Colonial Mechanical employees had
constructed ladders made of insufficient and unsafe design in order to
access the ballroom roof and the exhibit hall. After Colonial Mechanical was
issued two citations for violating state law, the company rented a stair
tower to access the exhibit hall and constructed stairs to access the
ballroom roof.
The state’s inspection was followed by four months of investigation by
federal OSHA inspectors, who cited Colonial Mechanical for two safety
violations. |
|
Many Safety Violations Admitted by Colonial Mechanical |
| With the evidence of a troubling rate of accidents at
Colonial Mechanical, one might also expect to find evidence of violations of
safety rules at Colonial. Colonial Mechanical’s own work sight audit found
over 140 violations of safety rules at its own job sites in a one-year
period. This included 45 cases of workers who lacked required safety
glasses. These violations may explain the 13 eye injuries suffered by
Colonial Mechanical workers during the same time period. There are other
indications that safety problems are worsening at Colonial Mechanical. A
Colonial worker who was working at the Norfolk
International Airport in Virginia recently fell fifteen feet to the floor
below, suffering traumatic injuries. As a result, in June 2001, the Virginia
Occupational Safety and Health Compliance issued a serious violation and
proposed a $1,625 fine against Colonial Mechanical for breaking safety
regulations regarding protecting workers from fall hazards. The violation
states: "... an employee working outside the perimeter of the guard rail
system ... without wearing his fall arrest system and therefore fell 15 feet
to the floor below, resulting in traumatic body injury." |
|
Construction Customers Take Note |
These statistics are very important to the customers of
Colonial Mechanical Corporation and to every customer of a construction and
maintenance company. Any of those 100 injured workers at Colonial Mechanical
is a potential plaintiff in a lawsuit against you, the customer of Colonial
Mechanical, especially if the injury took place while Colonial was working
at your place of business.
|
So far in 2001, only 8 out of 30 jobs have gone two
months without a safety violation or lost time injury. |
Colonial Mechanical itself urges its supervisors to carefully investigate
accidents. Policy asks employees "to document facts and preserve evidence in
case law suits are filed later." Colonial Mechanical is not the only company
that will be sued by its injured workers.
I f the injury takes place at your facility, or even if the injury
takes place at Colonial’s fabrication shop, and the workers are
manufacturing materials for installation at your facility, you, the Colonial
Mechanical customer, may be the one who gets sued.
With scores of Colonial Mechanical construction workers injured every
year, the odds are good that some one will be injured at your facility while
Colonial is working there. While the Colonial Mechanical newsletter for the
second quarter of 2001 announced over 30 new construction and maintenance
jobs for Colonial, the same newsletter could only list eight jobs that had
gone only two months without a safety violation or lost time injury. |

|