AN ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED CUSTOMER GETS SUED OVER
UNPAID BILLS
Wesco
Distribution V All Temperatures Controlled, A&A Electric, Reliance Insurance
and the Los Angeles Community College District
Wesco Distribution was originally hired to furnish electrical supplies
for a job at the Pierce County Energy Retrofit job at Pierce College in
Woodland Hills. According to Wesco Distribution’s court suit, they were not
paid for materials worth $62,407. Since All Temperatures Controlled was the
original contractor on this project, they were sued for this money. In
addition, the project owner, the Los Angeles Community College District, was
also sued. This is yet another sad example of how a hapless construction
customer was dragged into court because of a payment dispute between two
contractors.
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED
V FIDELITY & DEPOSIT INSURANCE
COMPANY OF MARYLAND, FASSBURG CONSTRUCTION, OTHERS
All Temperatures Controlled originally agreed to supply approximately
$94,000 of equipment and labor to Fassburg Construction for a heating,
ventilating and air conditioning system to the Brentwood Place on Wilshire
Blvd, a top-shelf address in Los Angeles. All Temperatures Controlled says
they were not paid. They filed a lien against the property and followed it
with a court suit against Fidelity, who issued the performance bonds for
that job.
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland objected. They answered that All
Temperatures Controlled had unclean hands and were barred under several
legal doctrines from recovering any money and failed to mitigate their
claimed damages.
Then the case was merged with another court suit filed by All
Temperatures Controlled against Fassburg Construction, the general
contractor on that job. The whole mess was later settled, but not before the
unfortunate property owner, the general contractor and the insurance company
had to wade through a
court suit.
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED
V RINE DEVELOPMENT INC., LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, WASHINGTON
INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
In 1999-2000, All Temperatures Controlled was hired to do a job for
perhaps the largest construction customer in the State of California— the
University of California. The proposed work was the furnishing and
installation of heating, venting and air conditioning systems for the
University of California at Los Angeles campus’ Kerchoff Hall project. All
Temperatures Cont-rolled’s arrangement was not actually with the University
of California, but instead was through another contractor, Rine Development.
All Temperatures Controlled also had arrangements through Rine
Development for several other jobs with another large California client, the
Los Angeles Unified School District.
In sum, All Temperatures Controlled sued Rine Development for a total of
$188,903 over charges of unpaid construction claims. This is one matter that
ended up in court.
Another matter is the issue of All Temperatures Controlled’s legal
tactics. Not only did All Temperatures Controlled sue Rine Development, they
also sued the Los Angeles Unified School District. This, in effect, dragged
the construction customer into court because of All Temperatures
Controlled’s dispute, not with the customer, but with another contractor.
All Temperatures Controlled ultimately sued not only the school district
and Rine Development, but
two of the bonding companies for both the University of California and
the Los Angeles School District jobs.
However, All Temperatures Controlled did not get a free ride in this
litigation. One of the bonding companies, Developers Insurance, promptly
filed a cross-complaint. All Temperatures Controlled ultimately filed to
dismiss the case against the other parties, just seven months after it had
originally been filed. The cross-complaint by Developers Insurance was not
dismissed and the court awarded a default judgement on Developers’ motion,
four months later.
ANOTHER CHANGE ORDER DISPUTE
GOES BAD, LEADS TO LITIGATION
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED, INC. V ACC CONTRACTORS
In too many construction disputes, a failure to communicate over a change
order starts all parties down the slippery road into a court room battle.
That appears to be the situation in this case, which was filed in June 2001.
The construction job started innocently enough, when ACC Contractors hired
All Temperatures Controlled to install a heating, venting and air
conditioning system at Taft High School in Canoga Park, California.
ACC Contractors originally agreed to pay All Temperatures Controlled
$470,000 for that work. Along the way, the job grew. In the end, ACC
Contractors paid over $700,000 to All Temperatures Controlled, which was
almost twice the original price, according to the court suit. But All
Temperatures Controlled said that wasn’t enough money and they wanted
another $58,386. When ACC Contractors did not pay up quickly, All
Temperatures Controlled filed a court suit against ACC.
COURT SUIT CHARGES KICKBACK
SCHEME IN LOS ANGELES
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED, INC. V TURNER CONSTRUCTION, INC., OTHERS
All Temperatures Controlled claimed it was the lowest bidder on the
Mission Community Hospital project in Los Angeles County. But All
Temperatures Controlled charged that Turner Construction took a kickback
from another contractor to revoke its bid award to All Temperatures
Controlled, gave the work to that other contractor and then told All
Temperatures Controlled to get their trailer off of the project premises.
All Temperatures Controlled claimed that this was an unfair and unlawful
business practice and interference with their business advantage for Turner,
Mission Hospital and the contractor to accept "kickback money."
According to the court documents, in October 2000 All Temperatures
Controlled asked for the $36,212 in set up expenses it had already incurred
in this suit against their own prospective customer and a large general
contractor.
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED
SUES ANOTHER CUSTOMER
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED, INC. V MS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, OTHERS
All Temperatures Controlled originally agreed to supply approximately
$68,000 of equipment and labor for a heating, venilating and air
conditioning system at the San Jose Elementary School in Mission Hills, near
Los Angeles. All Temperatures Controlled also claimed that they agreed to
supply approximately $44,000 of equipment and labor to MS Construction for
the Gault Street Elementary School in Van Nuys, for a total of over $111,000
in labor and equipment.
All Temperatures Controlled says they were not paid, so in August of 2000
they filed a court suit against the school district, the bonding company and
MS Construction who was the general contractor, as stated in
the original lawsuit.
The school district filed an answer to the lawsuit, charging that All
Temperatures Controlled failed to perform their contractual duties and
promises and that All Temperatures Controlled was liable for offset and back
charges under the contract’s liquidated damages provision.
MS Construction Management filed their own answer, pointing out that All
Temperatures Controlled’s construction license had lapsed, which could bar
them from filing a court action. All Temperatures Controlled’s complaint was
dismissed just a few months later.
Labor Ready, Inc. V All
Temperatures Controlled, Inc., Others
This lawsuit with its important implications for the construction
industry was filed on September 11, 2000. Labor Ready, one of the country’s
largest suppliers of temporary construction labor, is suing All Temperatures
Controlled, one of Southern California’s largest sheet metal contractors.
Labor Ready charges in this suit that they had a contract to supply
laborers to All Temperatures Controlled over the past four years, yet All
Temperatures Controlled has failed to pay Labor Ready for those services.
Now Labor Ready charges that All Temperatures Controlled owes them over
$64,076, plus 18% interest.
Although Labor Ready had asked All Temperatures for the money, they had
not paid. However, All Temperatures Controlled claims that Labor Ready
failed to properly notify and bill them for the correct prevailing wage rate
for the laborers that they used. This meant that All Temperatures Controlled
was denied the opportunity to determine whether or not to use those
employees.
Part of All Temperatures Controlled’s problem in keeping a skilled,
highly trained labor force on hand is that they are charged with
discriminating against union-affiliated workers. All Temperatures Controlled
is entitled to operate non-union. If the company is illegally discriminating
against union members, they are not only breaking federal law, but they are
also denying themselves and their clients access to a significant pool of
well trained workers who have graduated from a stringent apprenticeship
program.
All Temperatures Controlled,
Inc. V Statewide Construction Management, Inc., Others
In this June 2000 court suit, All Temperatures Controlled sued their
general contractor, Statewide Construction and the construction customer
(Los Angles School District). All Temperatures Controlled sued for a
whopping $907 in work they had performed at the Fulbright Elementary School
that was completed in 1999. Other All Temperatures Controlled claims
involved more substantial sums. All Temperatures Controlled claimed that
Statewide and the school district were liable for $33,907 worth of work
performed at the Hamlin Street School. They also filed stop notices with the
school district over their payment dispute with Statewide.
All Temperatures Controlled
Sues a Customer
All Temperatures Controlled filed a suit in 1999 against the City of
Angels Medical Center/Ingleside Hospital, in a dispute over payment for work
at this facility. All Temperatures Controlled claimed they were still owed
$365,108.
Preferred Concept V All
Temperatures Controlled, INC.
Preferred Concept sued All Temperatures Controlled in 1998, charging that
All Temperatures Controlled had paid only $6,000 on a debt of $36,466.
Preferred Concept supplied the work and materials to install an insulated
wall and ceiling and freezer doors at Manhattan Bagel. Preferred Concept
also filed a mechanic’s lien against Manhattan Bagel in San Fernando,
California. In other words, Manhattan Bagel suffered a lien against its
property, because All Temperatures Controlled did not pay its debts,
according to the court complaint. All Temperatures Controlled was also
charged with willful and deliberate violations of the California Business &
Professional codes. In turn, as the following case demonstrates, All
Temperatures Controlled filed its own lien and court suit.
All Temperatures Controlled
V Company of the West, RCWQ Realty Fund
This 1998 case is another sad commentary on the All Temperatures
Controlled construction job at Manhattan Bagel. In this complaint, All
Temperatures Controlled tried to collect on its own mechanic’s lien for this
job. Originally, Manhattan Bagel agreed to pay All Temperatures Controlled
$315,113 for a variety of freezer work, cooler work and set up of other food
preparation units. Then Manhattan Bagel refused to pay $183,128 of that sum.
All Temperatures Controlled sued these entities because they may have a
right of ownership in the Manhattan Bagel property.
Manuela mary Pettiford V All
Temperatures Controlled, Others
Kemp Brothers Construction V All Temperatures Controlled
These two 1998 cases involve allegations of more problems at the All
Temperatures Controlled job at Northridge Hospital. Ms. Pettiford was
injured when All Temperatures Controlled and other contractors left debris
across the walkway in the hospital’s parking garage. All Temperatures
Controlled eventually paid Ms. Pettiford a settlement.
UPDATE ON AN IMPORTANT COURT CASE LISTED IN THE LAST ISSUE
of
the Contractors Critic
CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT filed BY ESCOBAR, SPECK, SORIANO V
ALL TEMPERATURES CONTROLLED — STILL PENDING
This important case could cause All Temperatures Controlled to pay large
sums in back wages and owed benefits to many of its former and current
employees. Despite the potential enormous liability to All Temperatures
Controlled, they have been unable to settle this case. This litigation is
still pending with a case status conference scheduled for October 4, 2002.
This Class Action Breach of Contract and Unlawful and Unfair Business
Practice law suit was originally filed in October 2000. Jose Escobar, Mike
Speck and Vincente Lopez Soriano were all sheet metal workers who were
employees of All Temperatures Controlled during the last four years. This
court complaint was filed on behalf of these three workers and all other All
Temperatures Controlled employees who were employed on public works jobs.
The workers charge that All Temperatures Controlled refused to pay them the
legal and prevailing wages for their job classifications.
The suit also claims that All Temperatures Controlled failed to pay all
of the wages due to the workers at the time of their termination of
employment and that they breached its contract with various contractors and
customers by failing to pay the agreed-on prevailing wages on public works
jobs.
The court suit also contended that All Temperatures Controlled gained an
unfair and unlawful advantage over contractors that did actually pay
prevailing wages.